The research of the citizens’ perception of the corruption of the institutions shows that the courts are more corrupt than the Macedonian government, which is a yardstick measure for corruption. These are the conclusions from the results presented in the research paper Citizens on Corruption, published in 2018 by the Faculty of Security in Skopje, writes .
Do you think it is a coincidence that the Defenders of the Constitution are sent to prisons while the organizers of the April 27 coup in Macedonia, puppets of Soros and globalist deep State, are free with well-paid government jobs? The same Soros and Deep State scenario that was implemented abroad is now implemented in the USA after 6th of January! And that 4 years of imprisonment of an old man for touching the hair of a “political chicken” is accidental, while the betrayal of the Macedonian people goes unpunished?
Or that the Macedonian secret services are infiltrating individuals into new parties to take them over with the help of the same corrupt judiciary and prevent any opportunity for the electorate to conduct a peaceful political revolution? They even brag of the “recognition” by the corrupt courts, as do election thieves and coup plotters from the United States, that “corrupt courts are ours”, not realizing that they are categorizing themselves in the same corrupt anti-peoples elite! See picture on the left!
As news portal Republika wrote in the article, Scandalous election of judges: Judicial filed the Appeal with party pets of SDSM and DUI, after a year of political bargaining, the Judicial Council made the most scandalous election of judges in the Court of Appeal in Skopje, filling them with Communists of SDS and DUI terrorists from UCK (CIA-funded Kosovo Army, breading ground for terrorists in the West and ISIS). Of the six judges elected, at least five were not to be elected, Svedok reported. The election was postponed several times, because the wing of Zoran Zaev in SDSM at any cost asked a judge from Strumica to come to Skopje, as opposed to Skopje, which had another favorite for the vacant position in the business sector. To make the scandal bigger, the court, although it formed lists of registered Macedonian judges and another list of nationalities, did not select any of those who were at the top of the list according to the results of the work (in the order of the Judicial Council Commission), but fulfilled desires, dragging candidates from the bottom of the lists.
This is how the corrupt judiciary works, and that it is not only your perception, below we present excerpts from the analysis (full text at the end) of the five-year research results of a group of professors who synthesize and interpret the perceptions of the citizens of the Republic of Macedonia about the corruption in the country,
We present excerpts of the study below: Of course, science has an important role in detecting the dangers and offering solutions in dealing with corruption, says the scientific research of Prof. Cane Mojanoski and associates. Above all, its contribution is seen in researching the causes of the occurrence, identifying common elements and, based on scientific research, offering certain proposals for overcoming such a situation, or mitigating the consequences of corruption, which, unfortunately, is increasingly present in all pores of human life. In that direction, the results of the research specified in the project are expected to contribute to eradicating this issue.
Corruption as a phenomenon, today, is a serious threats to the rule of law. It is a form of government dominated by self-love, and is followed by a reference to (mostly business) interests. It is a social condition and practice, which negatively affects the overall social development, slows down economic processes, worsens social security and shatters perceptions and beliefs about the value of principles, especially the principles of legality, equality, equality and freedom. Corruption is established and expressed as a form of hidden and illegal redistribution and (abuse) of the core of social power and authority. Through corruption, and in conjunction with other mechanisms of the parties, state and power, they are privatized, and then turned into a market item. Within that framework, the exchange or exchange of the part of the society that has political power and the part of the society that has power over material goods takes place. Corruption is contrary to the rule of law and poses a direct threat to the democratic institutions and moral foundations of society. The analysis indicates that the perception of corruption is concentrated around a certain set of indicators related to the institutions and the institutional set-up, as well as the incumbents and those in charge of public services. In fact, research results suggest that ineffective Institutional response to solving citizens’ problems is hijacked by the corruption. The analysis of the results indicates that the fight against corruption is ineffective due to its coverage of the functions and institutions whose primary and basic task is to work on creating a legal framework and social conditions for dealing with it. What do the mean values show? That the assessments with the highest degree of abuse of powers by the executive and administrative authorities, the courts and the local self-government are the most frequent, i.e. the mayors in 2014, 2015 and 2016.
The scores for these bodies are more than 7 out of a possible score of 10. The second highest score for abuse of powers is addressed to the courts (judges) in 2013, 2014 and 2017, i.e. to the administrative authority (ministries) in 2015 and 2016. The data indicate that the highest rated in 2013 and 2014 are the courts (judges), and in 2015, 2016 and 2017 the local self-government (mayors). The assessments of the courts in both years are almost with the same value of 7.77 or 7.76 out of the possible ten, which indicates that in the perceptions of the citizens are intertwined numerous information and knowledge, primarily from the media and friends, as well as personal experiences that point to the occurrence of corruption in these environments. The answer to these questions more or less follows the answers, ie the assessments of the illegal mediation and the abuse of position and authority, which all end with the act of accepting bribes. From the review (below) it can be seen that in these parts of society (courts, ie judges and local self-government, ie mayors), there is consistency among the respondents.
They rank high in the practice of one form of corruption – bribery. The review indicates that the respondents evaluate the judges as NUMBER ONE RECEIVER OF BRIBE. The degree of risk exposure in 2015 according to the form of risk looked like this: cash was given to a doctor, money to the account of a judge, sponsorship of a school principal, other and other services of a high school teacher.
Those who were in a situation to give bribes in the form of money to the account the order is: 1) to a judge, 2) a public servant (municipality), 3) a prosecutor, 4) a mediator and 5) a civil servant (administration). Sponsorships were mostly given to a judge, then to someone else, a public servant (municipality), a prosecutor and a politician. And when it comes to services of various natures, the respondents answered that it is usually “someone else” who is not mentioned in this group of institutions, bodies, functions and professions, then school principal, high school teacher, mediator and politician. In an effort to address the corruption situation, a number of respondents recommend that “greater control over civil servants (doctors, police officers, ministers, MPs) and their work by anti-corruption bodies that are subject to or targeted by corruption”, as well as “greater control and dismissal, greater control and greater penalties for people involved in corruption”, and in that context “greater control of the inspection bodies”, especially the “competent authorities for the fight against and prevention of corruption, adequate implementation of the legislation as well as control and supervision over the competent bodies that fight against corruption.”
The fight against corruption is also monitored through the efforts for “professionalization of the services for prevention and sanctioning of corruption, introduction of a career system and positive discrimination of the officials involved in the anti-corruption system and most importantly the departmentalization of the same services”, with “professionals in the right places, higher wages and higher standards, by anonymous surveying of people who needed to use institutions that could abuse citizens”, ie by “professional work, and severe penalties”.
These are some of the suggestions that respondents suggested to the research team in trying to identify how we can deal with the complexity of corruption and corrupt processes in our society. The research results as a whole and the comments of the respondents indicate that in the society, the undertaken activities of the competent bodies and institutions, especially those in charge of preventing corruption, fail to deal with it, that in the overall social process there is an intertwining of relations and certain areas are identified where there are indications of links between individual institutions, bodies and functions and certain areas, such as the civil sphere, in which the global directions of corrupt behavior can be identified. That in the social reality is expressed through the indicator absence of institutional capacity to perform the normatively determined positions, but also for the absence of integrity and responsibility in the performance of public authorizations and tasks.
Therefore, based on the analysis so far, it is necessary to point out that it is necessary to establish forms of more efficient cooperation between the actors in the fight against corruption, to increase social, above all, civil control over them and to start the process of staffing in institutions, responsible for detecting, preventing and resolving corruption. In this regard, it should be practice for state bodies, such as the State Commission for Prevention of Corruption, to turn more to the academic community, to encourage and stimulate research, so that it can define strategic goals and develop action plans. That is why it should be emphasized that relying only on professional research approaches and entities held by European and other sources of funding, narrows the space and insufficiently provides knowledge transfer and practical knowledge and information do not become the basis for determining ways to solve problems. This, in turn, results in insufficiently thought out, planned and systematically guided actions and activities.
For that purpose, a wider network of related institutions is needed that will exchange data and implement joint projects, in order to successfully prevent corruption – concludes the research paper of Professor Dr. Cane T. Mojanoski, Professor Dr. Marina Malish-Sazdovska Associate Professor Dr. Marjan Nikolovski Associate Prof. Katerina Krstevska, PhD – CITIZENS ABOUT CORRUPTION (Analysis of research results 2013 – 2017) SKOPJE, 2018 Publisher: Faculty of Security – Skopje About the publisher: Associate Prof. Dr. Nikola Dujovski, Dean of the Faculty of Security – Skopje.
Mojanoski Malis-Sazdovska Nikolovski Krstevska – Citizens About Corruption (Use google translate)